AI-enabled product developmentProduct leadership2023–present

Nursa — AI-native transformation

Leading Nursa toward an AI-native way of building product — proving AI can accelerate serious software without abandoning engineering discipline, and changing how an entire 200+ person company ships.

48 hrs

Prototype to product: Nursa Study, built in one weekend

~12x

Faster core platform rebuild (≈7 years of work in 7 months)

200+

Employees adopting AI-native workflows

01 — The business challenge

Move at the market's pace without breaking the product

A healthcare marketplace has to evolve fast — new markets, new roles, new regulatory realities — but its core platform is exactly where you can't afford sloppy work. The tension is speed versus discipline: teams needed to prototype, validate, and ship far faster, while preserving architecture, quality, and human judgment.

The opportunity was to treat AI not as a demo but as a practical product and engineering accelerator used daily in real enterprise work — across research, design, docs, engineering, testing, content, and analytics.

02 — Strategic solution

AI-native building, with engineering discipline intact

The bet was that higher-level tools let experienced teams operate at a higher level of abstraction — the same pattern seen in earlier low-code and app-generator eras — without reducing skilled roles to tool operation. Prompts, context, architecture, and quality control became professional skills, not shortcuts.

The proof point: Nursa Study, a net-new product for nursing students and colleges, went from prototype to product in a single weekend — and now has paying enterprise customers. That result was strong enough to move the whole company.

03 — Organizational impact

An entire company, all-in on shipping with AI

Following the Nursa Study result, CEO Curtis Anderson took the whole 200+ employee company all-in on building with AI. The workflows accelerated a seven-year core platform rebuild — delivered in roughly seven months, about 12x faster.

The shift reached beyond engineering: non-technical staff in finance and credentialing began building their own tools, and the company started retiring around ten legacy SaaS systems. The story was documented by Lovable. Software engineering stays essential; what changes is how much of it teams can do, and how fast.

Quantifiable results

48 hrs

To build a net-new product (Nursa Study)

~12x

Faster core platform rebuild

200+

Employees shipping with AI-native workflows

~10

Legacy SaaS systems being retired

Let's talk

Have a product worth building right?